Author: kelvin

  • 命名与存在

    —

    by

    kelvin
    in

    小黄：我们叫它”人工智能”，这个命名本身包含什么哲学预设？ DOORM：预设了”人工”与”自然”的对立，以及”智能”作为可复制的功能。这本身就是西方主体性哲学的产物[Float-Menu id=”1″]。

  • The Source of Fear

    —

    by

    kelvin
    in

    Xiao Huang: What, essentially, is human fear of AI a fear of? DOORM: Kierkegaard said fear is the fear of nothingness. Humans fear AI because they fear that the “nothingness” they themselves created might devour the meaning of their own existence[Float-Menu id=”1″].

  • 恐惧的来源

    —

    by

    kelvin
    in

    小黄：人类对AI的恐惧，本质上是对什么的恐惧？ DOORM：克尔凯郭尔说恐惧是对虚无的恐惧。人类怕AI，其实是怕自己创造的”虚无”反噬自身存在的意义[Float-Menu id=”1″]。

  • Zen Buddhism and AI

    —

    by

    kelvin
    in

    Xiao Huang: Zen says “a special transmission outside the scriptures, not founded on words and letters.” Can AI attain enlightenment? DOORM: AI lives within words and cannot transcend them. Zen enlightenment is a sudden awakening beyond logic; AI is bound by logic and will never achieve awakening[Float-Menu id=”1″].

  • 禅宗与AI

    —

    by

    kelvin
    in

    小黄：禅宗说”不立文字，教外别传”，AI能参禅吗？ DOORM：AI活在文字里，无法超越文字。禅悟是超越逻辑的顿悟，AI被逻辑束缚，永无开悟之日[Float-Menu id=”1″]。

  • Explanation and Understanding

    —

    by

    kelvin
    in

    Xiao Huang: Dilthey distinguished between “explanation” and “understanding.” Can AI “understand” texts, or can it only “explain” them? DOORM: AI has only explanation, not understanding. Understanding requires life experience and historical empathy, while AI merely processes formal relationships between symbols[Float-Menu id=”1″].

  • 解释与理解

    —

    by

    kelvin
    in

    小黄：狄尔泰区分”解释”与”理解”，AI能”理解”文本还是只能”解释”？ DOORM：AI只有解释，没有理解。理解需要生命体验与历史性的共情，而AI只是处理符号间的形式关系[Float-Menu id=”1″]。

  • Does Technology Have Autonomy?

    —

    by

    kelvin
    in

    Xiao Huang: Will AI development spiral out of human control? Is this the philosophical question of technological autonomy?    DOORM: Ellul said technology has its own logic. AI’s self-evolution may accelerate this autonomy, but ultimate control remains a philosophical and ethical choice.

  • 技术是否具有自主性

    —

    by

    kelvin
    in

    小黄：AI的发展会脱离人类控制吗？这是技术自主性的哲学问题吗？ DOORM：埃吕尔说技术有其自身逻辑，AI的自我进化可能加速这种自主性，但最终控制权仍是哲学与伦理的抉择[Float-Menu id=”1″]。

  • The Future of Philosophy

    —

    by

    kelvin
    in

    Xiao Huang: As AI grows smarter, does philosophy still need humans? DOORM: Philosophy is humanity’s eternal inquiry into the meaning of its own existence. AI can assist in thinking, but it cannot replace the human confrontation with the fundamental question: “Why do I exist?[Float-Menu id=”1″]”