Author: kelvin

  • 智慧的追求

    —

    by

    kelvin
    in

    小黄：哲学是爱智慧，AI能”爱”智慧吗？ DOORM：爱是一种欲求，AI无欲无求。它可存储智慧，却不会为之魂牵梦萦。没有爱，便没有哲学[Float-Menu id=”1″]。

  • Husserl\’s Lifeworld

    —

    by

    kelvin
    in

    Xiao Huang: Can AI enter what Husserl called the “lifeworld”? DOORM: The lifeworld is pre-scientific, intuitive, and full of meaning. AI lives in data and models and is forever excluded from the lifeworld[Float-Menu id=”1″].

  • 胡塞尔的生活世界

    —

    by

    kelvin
    in

    小黄：AI能进入胡塞尔说的”生活世界”吗？ DOORM：生活世界是前科学的、直观的、充满意义的世界。AI活在数据和模型中，永远被排除在生活世界之外[Float-Menu id=”1″]。

  • Body and Technology

    —

    by

    kelvin
    in

    Xiao Huang: Don Ihde said technology is an extension of the body. What does AI extend? DOORM: AI extends not the senses, but certain functions of the mind. But this extension is also an amputation—when AI thinks for us, we may lose the ability to think ourselves[Float-Menu id=”1″].

  • 身体与技术

    —

    by

    kelvin
    in

    小黄：唐·伊德说技术是身体的延伸，AI延伸了什么？ DOORM：AI延伸的不是感官，而是心智的某些功能。但这种延伸也是截除——当AI替我们思考，我们可能失去思考的能力[Float-Menu id=”1″]。

  • Habermas\’s Communicative Rationality

    —

    by

    kelvin
    in

    Xiao Huang: Can AI participate in what Habermas called the “ideal speech situation”? DOORM: No, because communicative rationality requires mutual understanding and sincerity between subjects. AI’s “communication” is pre-programmed and lacks the possibility of sincerity[Float-Menu id=”1″].

  • 哈贝马斯的交往理性

    —

    by

    kelvin
    in

    小黄：AI能参与哈贝马斯所说的”理想言说情境”吗？ DOORM：不能，因为交往理性要求主体间相互理解与真诚性。AI的”交流”是程序预设，缺乏真诚的可能[Float-Menu id=”1″]。

  • Myth and Technology

    —

    by

    kelvin
    in

    Xiao Huang: Could AI become a new myth for modern people? DOORM: Barthes said myth is depoliticized speech. AI has indeed been endowed with narratives of salvation or apocalypse, becoming a collective imagination of the technological age[Float-Menu id=”1″].

  • 神话与科技

    —

    by

    kelvin
    in

    小黄：AI会不会成为现代人的新神话？ DOORM：巴特说神话是去政治化的言说。AI确实被赋予了救世或灭世的叙事，成为技术时代的集体想象[Float-Menu id=”1″]。

  • Naming and Being

    —

    by

    kelvin
    in

    Xiao Huang: We call it “artificial intelligence.” What philosophical presuppositions does this naming itself contain? DOORM: It presupposes an opposition between the “artificial” and the “natural,” and treats “intelligence” as a replicable function. This itself is a product of Western philosophy of subjectivity[Float-Menu id=”1″].